Just as Vice Chancellors must
be held responsible for the poor rankings of their universities, Higher
Education Minister Mustapha must also bear personal responsibility for the
dismal international ranking of Malaysian universities
_________________________
Speech at DAP Bukit Bintang Dinner
by Lim Kit Siang
____________________________
(Kuala
Lumpur,
Wednesday):
Just as Vice Chancellors must
be held responsible for the poor rankings of their universities, the
Higher Education Minister, Datuk Mustapha Mohamad must bear personal
responsibility for the dismal international ranking of Malaysian
universities - particularly for Malaysia falling completely out of the
list of the world�s Top 200 Universities this year in the 2007 Times
Higher Education Supplement (THES) - Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) World
University Rankings.
Further details and studies have shown that Malaysian universities have
suffered a very serious drop in the international league of the world�s
best universities, virtually undergoing a free fall when compared to other
Top Universities.
For the first time, there is not a single university in the Top 200
Universities list.
Both Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) and Universiti Malaya (UM) had
fell out of the Top 200 Universities ranking, with UKM plunging from 185th
slot last year to 309th while University of Malaya plunged from 89th in
2004 to 169th in 2005, 192nd in 2006 to 246th in 2007. Universiti Sains
Malaysia (USM), which was ranked as the only �outstanding� five-star
university in a recent government survey, fell to 307th spot from 277 last
year. In 2005, USM was in the 326th spot.
But this is not the only dismal result for Malaysian universities in the
THES-QS 2007 ranking. Also for the first time, there is not a single
Malaysian university in the separate listing of Top 100 Universities for
five subject areas � Natural Sciences, Social Sciences, Arts and
Humanities; Life Sciences and Biomedicine; and Engineering and Information
Technology.
Last year Malaysia was placed in four of the 500 slots in the five Top 100
Universities for the five subjects - University of Malaya ranked 49 in
Social Sciences and 95 in Natural Sciences, UKM No. 62 in Natural Sciences
and USM at No. 96 for Life Sciences and Biomedicine.
This year, Malaysia was completely excluded in all the five listings of
Top 100 Universities for the five categories.
There are 38 �elite of elite� universities, which are not only ranked in
the Top 200 Universities list, but also ranked in every one of the five
Top 100 subject list. The country breakdown and details for these 38
�elite of elite� universities are:
United States - 15
United Kingdom - 4
Australia - 6
Canada - 5
China - 2
Japan - 2
S. Korea - 1
Taiwan - 1
Spore - 1
Hong Kong - 1
Total - 38
I am very surprised that the Higher Education Minister, who visiting
universities in China last week, had asked the Chinese government to
recognize more Malaysian universities and colleges for two reasons.
It was news to me and to most Malaysians that China has recognized 50
institutions in the public and private sector in Malaysia � 7 IPTAs
(public institutions of higher learning) and 43 IPTSs (private
institutions). This is a clear indicator that public universities in the
country are losing out in terms of academic excellence and international
recognition to private institutions.
Secondly, the Chinese government has recognizing more Malaysian
universities and colleges than the Chinese universities and colleges
recognized by the Malaysian government � when many Chinese universities
are internationally recognized for their academic merit and excellence
while Malaysian universities have disappeared from the international radar
of academic excellence.
In the 2007 THES-QS World Top 200 University Rankings, six Chinese
universities were ranked but not a single one from Malaysia.
The six Chinese universities are:
36. Peking University
40. Tsinghua University
85. Fudan University
125. Nanjing University
155. University of Science and Technology of China
163. Shanghai Jiao Tong University
China has two universities,
Peking University and Tsinghua University, which are among the 38 �elite
of elite� universities, as they are also listed in all the Top 100
Universities in all five different categories.
Altogether, Chinese universities occupy 21 spots in the 500 slots in the
five Top 100 Universities for five categories � but Malaysia does not
recognize anyone of them although we do not occupy a single spot in the
500 slots for the five lists of Top 100 Universities.
Malaysia even refuses to accord recognition to the degrees of Peking
University and Tsinghua University, two of the �elite of elites�
universities as the Malaysian government only recognizes their degrees for
Chinese language studies.
Why has the Malaysian government not recognized these
internationally-acclaimed Chinese universities for their world-class
degrees and courses, when Malaysia does not have any equivalent
whatsoever?
It is most strange and extraordinary that a country which has dropped out
of world-class university rankings is asking for more recognition for its
universities from another country with universities of international
repute but which it has refused to recognize?
The Malaysian government should promptly and forthwith recognize all the
degrees of Chinese universities which are internationally-recognized as
among the world�s top universities, and not just the Chinese Language
Studies of four Chinese universities, before we can righteously ask China
for more recognition of Malaysian universities by Chinese government.
(21/11/2007)
* Lim
Kit Siang, Parliamentary
Opposition Leader, MP for Ipoh Timur & DAP Central Policy and Strategic
Planning Commission Chairman |