(Petaling Jaya, Friday): The
Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Dr. Mahathir Mohamad must have found American
Congressmen naïve and gullible as to buy his pleas for “patience” and not
to ask for “sudden…overnight change” when defending draconian laws like
the Internal Security Act, the Police Act and the Printing Presses and
Publications Act after having been Prime Minister in Malaysia for 21 years!
In
his speech at Capitol Hill to some
30 Congressmen from both the Republican and Democratic parties in Washington
to launch the US Congress’ Malaysia-American Friendship Caucus,
Mahathir said the West was “very
impatient and wanted change overnight”. He
said that “sudden change, even if it is for the good, is disruptive” and for
those who were not used to it, democracy could undermine the stability resulting
in war.
He
stressed the need for “patience” and said: “It is well to remember that
democracy is only a means and not an end in itself. It is the good that
democracy brings that counts, not democracy per se.”
This
is typical Mahathirian perverted illogic. How
can Mahathir honestly and credibly expect experienced and
sophisticated American Congressmen to buy his pleas for “patience”
and not to ask for “sudden...overnight
change” to justify the growing arsenal
of draconian and repressive laws in Malaysia when he had been the Prime Minister
in the country for 21 years and not 21 months, unless Malaysian lobbyists have
succeeded in assembling the most naïve and gullible congressmen to be found on
Capitol Hill in Washington to join the Caucus!
Instead
of lapping up Mahathir’s self-serving but meaningless pleas for “patience”
and not to ask for “sudden…overnight
change”, the US Congressmen who supported the formation of the US Congress’
Malaysia-American Friendship Caucus should have sent a clear signal to Mahathir
that in the best interests of Malaysia, they
would expect him to address in his Caucus inauguration speech his 21-year
record as Prime Minister on democracy
and human rights in Malaysia, why instead of progressive improvement in these
two important fields there had instead been a relentless emasculation of the
democratic process and serious deterioration of the condition of human rights in
the country.
Mahathir
told the Congressmen that his government is
“unable to accept the absolute freedom that you believe in…One day
perhaps we will be comfortable with your values, but for the moment we are not
comfortable.” This is another
piece of Mahathirish perverted illogic
by equating calls for greater democracy and human rights as demands for
“absolute freedom”, when nobody
in Malaysia is asking for “absolute freedom” and there is no such thing as
“absolute freedom” even in the US and the West or there would just be
anarchy!
Mahathir
claims that he inherited the draconian laws like the ISA when he became Prime
Minister but what he did not say was that he had refined and “perfected” all the repressive laws dating
from the colonial era to make them even
more draconian and repressive than their colonial antecedents through multiple
amendments by a mute and subservient Parliament to turn horrible laws into monstrous ones - like the ISA,
excluding judicial review of Ministerial abuses of power to use the
detention-without-trial law to stifle legitimate and democratic dissent.
In
Blair House in Washington, Mahathir labelled the reformasi six who had just
undergone an 11-day hunger strike to protest the anniversary of their ISA
detention as “nonentities” and said: “If we wanted to paralyse the
opposition, we would have arrested their leaders, not some of these people who
are the minor lights in their own party…They say things that stir people up so
we have to take action against them.” (The
Washington Post 15.5.2002)
This
is the best example of the deplorably sad state of democracy and human rights in
Malaysia, of the total misuse and abuse of the detention-without-trial ISA to
stifle the legitimate and democratic opposition - where
fundamental liberties recognized by all civilized societies can be
deprived indefinitely just because “they say things that stir people up” -
which is the professional preoccupation of every American Congressman, Republic
or Democratic. By this logic, every
American Congress would have to be locked up without trial under the ISA or
such-like legislation.
Mahathir
refuses to recognise the democratic and fundamental right of politicians to
“stir people up” against injustices, abuses of power and all forms of
excesses provided they
fall within the ambits of
the law and run the risk of prosecution and
public trial for any offences and transgressions of
the law.
Without
realising it, Mahathir had unconsciously given
the real reason for the ISA incarceration of the reformasi six, Mohamad
Ezam Mohamad Nor, Hishamuddin Rais, Chua Tian Chang, Saari Sungib, Badrulamin
Bahron and
DAP
welcomes the formation of the US Congress’ Malaysia-American Friendship Caucus
as Malaysians value their relationship with the United States, not only because
of bilateral educational and
political but also strong economic ties, as
the United States is the largest single investor in Malaysia with
some US$6 billion of direct investment in Malaysia and the country’s
largest customer, accounting for 20 per cent of all exports valued at US$22.3
billion last year as compared to US$9.4 billion Malaysian imports from the
United States.
However,
the US Congress’ Malaysia-American Friendship Caucus should promote friendship
between the US Congress and the Malaysian Parliament and people, and not just
with Mahathir and the government - and for this reason, the US Congress Caucus
should reach out to Malaysian Opposition parties, NGOs and the civil society to
get a balanced and representative picture of Malaysia.
The
US Congress Caucus cannot be unaware that the
American media had been critical of Mahathir during the visit, with The
New York Times even comparing him to Cuban dictator Fidel Castro when it used
the headline “White
House on Autocrats: Malaysian Si, Cuban No” to
imply that the Malaysian and Cuban leaders were fellow dictators.
The New York Times noted that President
George W. Bush used his White House appearance with Mahathir to continue the
“rehabilitation” of the Malaysian leader and also to castigate Castro as a
dictator who “ought to have free elections”, “ought to have a free
press” and “ought to free his prisoners” - and yet, he made no public
comments on Malaysia's record on the same issues.
In
the circumstances, the Congress Malaysia-American Friendship Caucus should place
on top of its agenda of friendship the promotion of democracy and human rights
in Malaysia - not to plug for “absolute freedom” or “sudden …overnight
change” but encourage perceptible
and measurable
progress of democratisation and greater respect for human rights in
Malaysia from time to time rather
than the reverse as a mark of the real “friendship” of the Caucus.
(17/5/2002)