(Penang, Tuesday): For
over four decades, the Malaysian Parliament had cut itself off from the
Commonwealth-wide process of parliamentary reforms and modernisations to make
Parliaments more meaningful and effective for MPs to discharge the trinity of
their functions - to legislate, to deliberate and to hold the government to
account.
For
close to half a century, other Commonwealth Parliaments have produced tombs of
reports on parliamentary reforms and modernisations, and experimented with a
battery of innovative ideas and
proposals to make the legislatures more
authoritative and more respected by their governments to give substance to the
principle of parliamentary democracy, where the government is
accountable to the people and it is the job of the legislature to ensure
that that accountability is real and transparent, and that it is upheld.
Malaysia,
however, has treated with disdain and even contempt such parliamentary reforms and modernisations in other
Parliaments, like the establishment of specialist committees to shadow each
Ministry and Opposition Day businesses.
There
had been many changes to the Malaysian Parliamentary
standing orders in the past four decades, but they invariably emasculate and not
to expand the limited space available to Members of Parliament to be effective
parliamentarians.
DAP
calls for far-reaching parliamentary reforms to make the Malaysian Parliament
fit for the 21st century era of information and communications
technology - and a visit to the Malaysian dinosaurian
parliamentary homepage will illustrate as to how unprepared is the Malaysian
Parliament for the new century of ICT.
There
are many specific proposals for parliamentary reforms which should be given
serious consideration so that Malaysian MPs
can fully discharge their triple functions to legislate, to deliberate and to
hold the government to account, whether in revamping the question hour as to
make PMQ (Prime Minister’s Question) an
important feature with the Prime Minister appearing at least twice a week of 15
minutes each to personally answer questions; one specialist parliamentary
committee for each Ministry; provision of top-flight parliamentary research
services which is completely non-existent for the past four decades; Opposition
business days where the Opposition decides on the parliamentary business to be
transacted, etc.
The
time has also come to reform the Dewan Negara, which has failed as a revising
chamber as intended by the 1957 Merdeka
Constitution and is nothing but a
rubbish dump for political has-beens and rejects of the ruling government creating
political cronies before there were economic cronies in the country.
The
1957 Merdeka constitution was framed to provide for an elected element for the
Senate in the future and 45 years after Merdeka, the Senate should be made more
representative and democratic by the introduction of elected Senators apart from
nominated Senators.
The
Senate should not continue to be the instrument of political patronage for the
Prime Minister and appointments by political patronage should be abolished. The
nominated Senators should be appointed by an statutory independent Appointments
Commission strictly on an independent basis.
Among
the various measures which should be adopted to ensure that the Senate is
reformed to become a more modern, representative, authoritative
and legitimate chamber is to have
permanent representation from the various major religious communities in
Malaysia in the Senate.
(7/5/2002)