Ketari by-election will be the last election campaign to raise issues like Damansara Chinese primary schools, Vision Schools, “ultimate objective” of national education policy  and mother-tongue education as the Election Offences Amendment Bill will make raising of these issues in future elections  “super sedition” offences


Media Statement
by Lim Kit Siang

(Petaling Jaya,  Wednesday): The Ketari by-election will be the last election campaign to raise issues like the Damansara Chinese primary schools, Vision Schools, “ultimate objective” of national education policy and mother-tongue education as the Election Offences Amendment Bill presented for  passage by the current meeting of Parliament will make raising of these issues in future elections “super sedition” offences. 

The Election Offences Amendment Bill is creating a new offence and the explanation by the Bill’s  explanatory statement is most misleading when it claimed that  the introduction of a new section 4A “is essentially a restatement of the provisions of paragraph 3(1)(e) of the Sedition Act 1948, incorporated with a view to preserving racial unity, etc. by prohibiting categorically any person from doing any act or making any statement which may create ill-will, discontent or hostility amongst the population of Malaysia in his endeavours to procure the election of any person”. 

The  new offence proposed under the Election Offences Amendment Bill is wider in scope and entails more severe sanctions than the original sedition offence, making it a “super sedition” offence designed to paralyse the Opposition in election campaigns by  criminalising Opposition electioneering  activities  - as it is clear from the history of selective prosecution of Opposition leaders that such “super sedition” offences would only be used against the Opposition and never against the Barisan Nasional politicians. 

The proposed new “super sedition” offence under the Election Offences Amendment Bill 2002 reads: 

“Offences of promoting feelings of ill-will or hostility 

“4A. (1) Any person who, before, during or after an election, directly or indirectly, by himself or by any other person on his behalf, does any act or makes any statement with a view or with a tendency to promote feelings of ill-will, discontent or hostility between persons of the same race or different races or of the same class or different classes of the population of Malaysia in order to induce any elector or voter to vote or refrain from voting at an election or to procure or endeavour to procure the election of any person shall be liable, on conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years or to a fine not exceeding ten thousand ringgit or to both such imprisonment or fine. 

(2) Subject to any specific provision to the contrary in any written law relating to an election, any person who is convicted of an offence under this section shall, until the expiration of five years from such conviction, be incapable of being registered or listed as an elector or of voting at an election or of being elected at an election, and if at that date he has been elected at an election, his seat shall be vacated from the date of such conviction.” 

If the new section 4A  is “essentially a restatement” of paragraph 3(1)(e) of the Sedition Act 1948, what is the need for the creation of a new offence when there is already the Sedition Act to deal with such offences. 

But this is more than a restatement for what we have is a “super sedition” offence meant to cripple free and fair election campaigning by the Opposition in general elections and by-elections. 

Firstly, the “restatement” has broadened the scope of paragraph 3(1)(e) of the Sedition Act 1948, which defines a “seditious tendency” as a tendency “to promote feelings of ill-will and hostility between different races or classes of the population of Malaysia”. The “super sedition” offence in the Election Offences Act is not confined to promoting feelings of ill-will and hostility “between different races or classes” but also between “persons of the same race” and “of the same class”. 

Secondly, the definition of the “super sedition” offence is so wide that it could cover all criticisms against the government party and candidate, whether on political, economic, educational, social, cultural or legal grounds or questions - and this is why I say that when this Bill  is enacted into law in  the present Parliamentary meeting, the Ketari by-election will be the last election campaign to raise issues like the Damansara Chinese primary schools, Vision Schools, “ultimate objective” of national education policy and mother-tongue education. 

In fact, in future election campaigns, Opposition attacks on the catalogues of abuses,  excesses and corruption of power by the government party, such as the  scandals involving Time dotCom,  MAS, Renong-UEM, Indah Water Konsortium, Perwaja,  the Tabung Haji or the lowest EPF dividend of 5% in 38 years could be roped in under the “super sedition” offence as having “a tendency to promote feelings of ill-will, discontent or hostility between persons of the same race or different races or of the same class or different classes of the population of Malaysia” to influence the voter - as the truth of the Opposition attacks and allegations would constitute no defence against the charge of “super sedition”. 

Thirdly, the “super sedition” offence in the Election Offences Bill imposes heavier penalties  than the Sedition Act, which provides for a maximum fine of RM5,000 or three years’ jail for the first offender.  The “super sedition” offence in the Election Offences Bill, however, carries a maximum RM10,000 fine or five years’ jail term as well as disqualification of a citizen’s civil and political rights to hold elective office, whether as MP or Assemblyman, or even to be a voter  for five years. 

The Election Offences Amendment Bill and the Elections Amendment Bill which were both tabled in Parliament in the past week are grave threats to a healthy and vibrant democratic system based on a free, fair and clean elections.  Both  generally institutionalise and legalise the Barisan Nasional electoral abuses and malpractices, particularly money politics, and criminalise free and fair election campaigning by the Opposition. 

The voters of Ketari must speak up loud and clear against the Election Offences Amendment Bill and the Elections Amendment Bill in the by-election on Sunday and demand that these two bills should be referred to an All-Party Election Laws Review Committee to restore public confidence in the conduct of free, fair and clean elections in Malaysia. 

(27/3/2002)


*Lim Kit Siang - DAP National Chairman