(Penang, Wednesday): The
Employees Provident Fund (EPF) Chairman, Tan Sri Abdul Halim Ali, should lead
the EPF Board on a nation-wide roadshow to explain to the 10.07 million EPF
contributors why EPF is paying 5% dividend - the
lowest in 37 years since 1963 - in keeping with the
principles of accountability, transparency and responsibility.
The
EPF should convene a general meeting of EPF contributors in every state in the
country to explain the reasons for the lowest EPF dividend in 37 years, its
investment policy and decisions, where
EPF Board members and officials can allay the concerns of the EPF contributors
about the safety, liquidity and yield of EPF funds.
In an
era where even the government talks
about good corporate governance, the EPF Board should concede to the demand and
rights of the 10.07 million EPF contributors for greater accountability,
transparency and scrutiny of the EPF and EPF Board members to ensure that there
is no imprudent, injudicious or illegal investment of the RM186.95 billion
EPF monies and in particular that
EPF monies are not used to bail-out troubled crony
or ex-crony companies.
The
lowest EPF dividend of 5% in 37 years has precipitated a new crisis of confidence in the EPF and the EPF Board must
seriously address the EPF contributors’ worries about
the safety and quality of their provident fund by the adoption of a new EPF
policy of accountability, transparency and good corporate governance.
The
EPF has a history of dubious transactions where the EPF funds were used
as a ready cash-rich source to bail-out troubled companies when its
first and last agenda should be to promote the best interests of the EPF
contributors.
In
the 1980s, the EPF was raided to fund dubious transactions resulting in the
EPF-Makuwasa scandal, causing huge losses
to the EPF.
The
EPF-Makuwasa scandal came about because the government wanted
to
In
recent times, the EPF’s involvement in the
RM1.88 billion Time dotCom IPO fiasco last year and dubious and
questionable loan facilities running into billions of ringgit to various
mega-projects and companies, like the billion ringgit loans to Perwaja
Terengganu Sdn. Bhd., Time Telecommunications Holdings Bhd. (renamed Time dotCom),
Bakun hydroelectric dam project, etc., have brought to the fore the question as
to whether the safeguarding of the EPF members’ interest had been subordinated
and even sacrificed to other considerations and agendas.
The
present serious lacuna in the EPF
Act, which does not provide for the accountability, transparency and scrutiny of
the EPF affairs by the EPF contributors, must be rectified by the EPF Board
adopting a new policy of accountability and transparency.
For a
start, the EPF Board should make
public a full list of all the loan
and bonds, stocks and shares as well as money market instruments bought with EPF
funds to subject them to public scrutiny to demonstrate that there were no
imprudent, injudicious or illegal investment of the RM186.95 billion EPF monies jeopardising the safety, liquidity and
yield of the EPF funds.
(13/3/2002)