(Petaling Jaya, Thursday): The Parliament Speaker, Tun Mohamad Zahir Ismail
should explain why he rejected the urgent motion of the DAP MP for Tanjong, Chow
Kon Yeow to debate the Suhakam Annual Report 2001 tabled on Monday while
approving the urgent motion of the PAS MP for Pokok Sena, Mahfuz Omar to debate the issue of quota for
non-Malays in matriculation courses in Mara college.
I am not saying that
Mahfuz’s urgent motion should not be debated but why Chow’s motion which
concerns the state of human rights in the country could not also be debated.
It is most regrettable that
the Speaker had also rejected Chow’s another motion to censure Foreign
Minister Syed Hamid Albar, as the minister in charge of human rights, for his
failures to to ensure Malaysia’s
compliance with international human rights standards, as the failure to
formulate a national action plan to promote and protect human rights in the
country.
It would appear that Parliament is headed for a
second grave dereliction of duty in refusing to
debate or give any notice to the Suhakam annual report 2001 tabled on Monday to
provide strong
“back-up” to Suhakam to
“protect and promote” human rights by mainstreaming
human rights issues through diligent and conscientious “oversight” over
Suhakam and giving serious
consideration to Suhakam reports and recommendations.
Unless the
Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Dr. Mahathir Mohamad
intervene to schedule a
special parliamentary debate on the Suhakam Annual Report 2001 in the current
meeting of Parliament which ends
next week, the second Suhakam
annual report will receive the same Parliamentary
neglect and contempt as the first Suhakam annual report last year.
A Suhakam Commissioner had expressed to me his
grave disappointment that the first Suhakam Annual Report 2000 did not receive
any debate or attention by Parliament after it was tabled in the Dewan Rakyat in
April last year, and it would appear that the same fate awaits the second
Suhakam Annual Report 2001.
Malaysians, in particular the human rights
NGO community and the civil society, should express their grave concern
at the repeated failure of Parliament
to discharge its “oversight” responsibilities over Suhakam to mainstream
human rights issues in the country by having a special debate on the latest
Suhakam annual report.
Until Malaysia has a Parliament which is more
responsible and responsive to its “oversight” responsibilities over Suhakam
to mainstream human rights issues, the human rights NGO community and the civil
society must step forward to fill the void created by Parliament.
The Round Table Conference on Suhakam annual
report 2002 to be held at the Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall (upstairs)
on Sunday, 23rd June 2002 (10 am – 1 pm)
will be the first step to replace
Parliament to exercise oversight over Suhakam and debate the Suhakam Report
2001.
Among those who have agreed to participate in
the Round Table Conference are
As convenor of the Round Table Conference, I
have also sent an invitation to the Suhakam
Chairman, Tan Sri Abu Talib Othman to attend and participate in the Round Table
Conference, as it will be a useful bridge between Suhakam and the NGO community
and the civil society.
As Members of Parliament, whether from
government or opposition, have not
been allowed to have a special debate on the Suhakam Annual Report 2001, the
Suhakam Round Table Conference on Sunday will provide a forum for the MPs both
to hear and to give their views.
DAP MP for Tanjong, Chow Kon Yeow, in
charge of the portfolio of human
rights among DAP MPs, is sending out an invitation to all MPs to the Round Table
Conference.
Admission to the Round Table Conference on
Suhakam Report 2001 is by
(20/6/2002)