The Securities Commission has failed in its statutory responsibility to promote fair and transparent securities market when it has failed to investigate manipulation in the late buying support on the KLSE.
Since 24th March 2001, I had called on the Securities Commission to investigate market manipulations in the stock market in the previous three months through massive institutional purchases of TMT stocks- Telekom Malaysia Bhd, Malayan Banking Bhd and Tenaga Nasional Bhd - in last three minutes of trading to jack up the Kuala Lumpur stock exchange composite index (KLCI).
In the past month, I had given three specific instances:
Although the market manipulations in the stock market through
massive institutional purchases of TMT stocks- Telekom
Malaysia Bhd, Malayan Banking Bhd and Tenaga Nasional Bhd - in last
three minutes of trading had stopped after April 2, 2001, Malaysians expect
the Securities Commission to take actions for:
Firstly, a full, independent and public inquiry into stock market manipulations through the three government-controlled TMT stocks of Tenaga, Maybank and Telekom - which together make up almost 40 per cent of the index's capitalisation - particularly in the last few minutes of trading in the first three months of the year.
Secondly, a full public accounting as to what are the funds running into millions and even tens of millions of ringgit involved in the last-minute institutional purchases to manipulate the KLCI - were EPF, Pensions Trust Fund, Tabung Haji and other government-linked funds and agencies involved?
The failure of the Securities Commission to investigate market manipulations in the stock market through massive institutional purchases of TMT stocks in the final minutes of trading to jack up the Kuala Lumpur stock exchange composite index (KLCI) in the first quarter of the year have greatly undermined investor and public confidence about its independence, professionalism, integrity and commitment to good corporate governance.
Can Ali explain why the Security Commission, and in particular its department AWAS which monitors all buyers and sellers on the KLSE, was so prompt to haul up ordinary remisiers or politically-unconnected brokers for questioning for any irregular market price, as for instance, if a counter at RM5 suddenly ended trading at RM5.50 with one lot, but is to tardy and relucant to act on the suspicious last-minute multi-million ringgit manipulation of the KLSE in the first quarter of the year?
Ali said the "last-minute buying" on the KLSE does not necessarily constitute market manipulation as one cannot punish investors for a "last-minute change of mind".
I agree, but did Ali come to this conclusion after a full investigation or had he already made up his mind that there was nothing irregular or improper in such a phenomen in the KLSE in the first quarter of the year without the need for any investigations?
As Securites Commission Chairman, Ali cannot be unaware of Section 84 of the Securities Industry Act (SIA) 1983,which states that "no such person shall create... or do anything that is calculated to create... a false or misleading appearance for active trading in any securities on a stock market", while Section 85 says "no person shall take part in... any number of transactions in securities in the effect of... a) raising, b) lowering or c) pegging, fixing maintaining or stabilising the prices of securities... which may include the purpose of inducing other persons... to acquire or dispose the securities of the corporation" and the opinion of legal experts that prima facie, the last-minute buying on index-linked counters are offences under the SIA.
The Securities Commission should also explain what actions it has taken to prevent misuse of nominee accounts to manipulate the market.
For instance, Cartaban Nominees (Asing) Sdn. Bhd and HSBC Nominees (Asing) Sdn. Bhd are very active player of the Tenaga stock.
These are their shares transactions on Tenaga stock in March,
2001:
Tenaga: Acquired DisposedCartaban Nominees (Asing) Sdn. Bhd:
1.3.01 125,000 86,000
2.3.01 504,000 81,000
5.3.01 585,000 78,000
7.3.01 85,000 289,000
9.3.01 84,000 26,121
12.3.01 31,000 40,000
13.3.01 31,000 192,000
14.3.01 5,000 49,000
15.3.01 23,000 209,300
16.3.01 90,000 72,000
19.3.01 - 76,000HSBC Nominees (Asing) Sdn. Bhd
1.3.01 - 263,000
2.3.01 566,000 389,000
5.3.01 84,500 361,000
7.3.01 - 168,000
8.3.01 16,000 116,000
9.3.01 31,000 161,000
12.3.01 63,000 146,000
13.3.01 87,000 87,000
14.3.01 - 66,000
15.3.01 - 31,000
16.3.01 38,000 156.000
16.3.01 26,400 -
19.3.01 2,000 285,000
20.3.01 - 339,000
21.3.01 - 217,000
22.3.01 80,000 -
22.3.01 - 50,000
23.3.01 69,000 21,000
27.3.01 - 350,000
28.3.01 169,000 34,000
29.3.01 101,800 8,000
30.3.01 42,000 3,000
30.3.01 28,800 189,000CHASE Malaysian Nominees (Asing) Sdn Bhd
1.3.01 657,000 -
8.3.01 318,000 -
15.3.01 - 56,000
22.3.01 - 954,400
These are their shares transactions on Telekom stock in March,
2001:
Telekom: Acquired DisposedHSBC Nominees (Asing) Sdn. Bhd
15.3.01 - 68,000
16.3.01 - 151,800
19.3.01 6,000 115,720
20.3.01 - 47,000
21.3.01 - 71,000
22.3.01 60,000 35,800
22.3.01 5,000 5,000
23.3.01 52,000 256,000
27.3.01 - 552,000
28.3.01 116,000 53,000
These are their shares transactions on Maybank stock in March,
2001:
Maybank: Acquired DisposedCartaban Nominees (Asing) Sdn. Bhd:
16.3.01 - 228,000
19.3.01 - 167,800
20.3.01 - 314,400
21.3.01 - 70,200
22.3.01 - 996,554
26.3.01 - 1,104,400
27.3.01 - 1,002,425
28.3.01 142,000 -
29.3.01 - 320,602
30.3.01 - 139.600
2.4.01 - 32,070
3.4.01 - 122,000
4.4.01 166,600 -
HSBC Nominees (Asing) Sdn. Bhd
15.3.01 20,000 241,900
16.3.01 - 485,800
19.3.01 2,000 132,600
20.3.01 - 294,200
21.3.01 4,000 122,200
22.3.01 40,000 7,000
23.3.01 57,000 221,300
27.3.01 6,000 202,000
28.3.01 - 375,600
29.3.01 97,400 179,000
30.3.01 26,000 200,400
30.3.01 - 249,800
2.4.01 10,000 197,400
3.4.01 8,000 296,000
4.4.01 489,000 242,600
CHASE Malaysian Nominees (Asing) Sdn Bhd
15.3.01 - 306,000
22.3.01 - 2,066,300
29.3.01 - 833,400
It is very clear from the massive transactons of these nominee companies in the TMT stocks, a full inquiry is in order to establish whether they play any role in the late buying support of the KLSE through institutional purchases of the TMT stocks and if so, who are the beneficial owners of these nominee accounts.
In this connection, I am most shocked that the Employees Provident Fund also uses nominee companies to invest heavily in the stock market. Can the EPF explain what percentage of its RM40 billion invested in equities are bought through nominee companies in the KLSE and the reason why it had to resort to nominee companies to hide its identity when operating in the stock market, raising disturbing questions of accountability, transparency and integrity.
(25/4/2001)